Skip to main content

Burning questions

If you're read this blog once or twice, you understand that I see things a little differently than some, so here are some questions, some rhetorical, some unanswerable, that I feel the need to ask at this particular point in time.....


Since the Oscar nominations were just announced, here's a good one (or, actually, a few good related ones): How is it that a movie can win Best Picture but its director NOT win Best Director? Or, if a movie director is responsible for coaxing a performance from a given actor, how can the actor win one of the acting awards and the director not win the corresponding prize for his/her category? And does the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences TRY to find obscure arthouse films to recognize, year after year? Nothing more frustrating to me than to really like a movie, hope for it to be nominated for SOMETHING, only to lose out to a movie that I've barely heard of!

Here's a similar question regarding the Grammy awards for the music industry: how can you have different winners for the categories of Song of the Year and Record of the Year?

Why do people who comment on newspaper and other information websites seem so hopelessly out of touch with reality? Case in point: my Cincinnati Reds made a couple of sensible player moves in the last week or so, and I was glad to see these moves. They unloaded a player who had no specific role on this year's team and got another club to take on his salary, and also added a proven veteran to fill the shortstop position for the coming year. Yet most of the comments on the corresponding Web site indicated that the Reds got taken by both the veteran player and the other team in these deals. Folks, you need to get a life....


Why are congressional Democrats whining that they "only" have a majority of 59-41 in the Senate? Don't they realize that there are advantages to having a majority?


Why did Rush Limbaugh feel the need to dance (badly) at the Miss America pageant Saturday, where he was a judge? Didn't he know that SOMEONE would have a camera?


Why don't people know the difference between barbecue and ribs?


I have a Twitter account, mostly to post the link to this blog as well as to look at the posts of others whom I follow. How do people decide what's "tweet-worthy?"


When advertising televisions, why do some retailers unfailingly list the important specifications (resolution, size, refresh rate, etc.) but others don't? Is it so that the less scrupulous retailer can take advantage of uninformed consumers? How could they?


Why do some bloggers feel that their opinions are so vastly important that they must post on everything they're thinking? Oh, wait......

Comments

  1. Is that Andy Rooney I hear? Just kidding. Love the blog, Rick!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Oscar Magico!

Good Monday morning to everyone!  If you're like me, and stayed up to watch the Oscars last night, you're a little sleep deprived.  I mean, after all, how often does an awards show end with a major twist in the ending?

If you didn't watch and have not watched or read the news, then you don't know about the colossal screw-up that ended what was a pretty entertaining Academy Awards show last night.  The final and biggest award, for the Best Picture, was being presented by Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway, selected apparently because 2017 represents the fiftieth anniversary year of their vehicle "Bonnie and Clyde."

In any case, after a brief political statement, the pair got down to business and introduced the nine nominees, then Beatty appeared a bit flummoxed by the contents of the envelope.  Dunaway laughed and said "you're impossible" and announced "La La Land," the odds-on favorite, as the winner.

In the midst of acceptance speeches b…

Learning opportunities

Good Monday morning to you.

Perhaps I should state up front that it's a bit of a blue Monday here in the Big Blue Nation, as our beloved Kentucky Wildcats went down in defeat to the arch-rival North Carolina Tar Heels last night in a wild and highly competitive game.  Kentucky's team never really got going in the first half, owing to foul trouble for three starters, and that foul trouble and lack of rhythm carried over for the rest of the game.  Somewhat miraculous that Kentucky had the lead at a couple of points late, but Carolina's depth and experience won out.

Though my wife doesn't agree, that's pretty much the end of basketball for me this year.  I don't watch much other college basketball except to see who Kentucky might end up playing, so if they're done, I probably am, too.

My company is getting into a new aspect of business that you've probably seen and heard about, but because I don't talk in detail about work in this space, I won't el…

Stunningly apathetic

Good afternoon to everyone.  Unusual day and time to post, but my schedule got a little fouled up this week.

Are you planning to watch the Super Bowl?  For a number of years, starting when our kids were, well, kids, we really made a big deal of the day of the big game, buying special snacks, planning a menu appropriate to the site of the game or the participating teams' cities, and so forth.

Last year was great, since the Denver Broncos won and our daughter and her family are season ticket holders!

But this year?  Hard to get excited about the New England Patriots (again) and the Atlanta Falcons.  Admittedly, the Falcons have a Kentucky native and UK grad on the roster, tight end Jacob Tamme, but he was injured mid-season and won't play.  But otherwise, the Falcons don't have any players who command a high level of attention from me.

And then there's the Patriots.  Sorry to my friends in the northeast, but I don't care for the team owner, the head coach, the offens…