Skip to main content

Cutting the cord

Our son and his wife recently decided to discontinue their cable television service.

What's that, you say?  How will they survive without "SportsCenter" on ESPN, or all of those "Law and Order" reruns on TNT (something that my son got ME hooked on, but that's a story for another post), or "House Hunters" on HGTV?

Quite well, it seems.

Not only are they saving money, but since they have a toddler and another baby on the way, it's not as though they had lots of time to watch TV anyway.  And, as conscientious parents, they've made a considered choice to limit the amount of television their daughter watches during a given week.

And, from all indications, they don't miss it.

So this started me thinking about life without cable.  And the $$$$$$$ associated with having cable service!  But then I began to think about what we really would's a brief list:

1)  Cincinnati Reds baseball games are available ONLY on Fox Sports Net Ohio, which is a cable-only channel.  Now that they broadcast over 140 games per season, all in high definition, it's a little difficult for me, a dyed-in-the-wool Reds fanatic, to NOT make arrangements to get their games.

There is a package one can purchase from MLBTV (major league baseball's centralized broadcasting repository) to see the games, and for the entire season the cost it just a little more than the price of cable in a month.  But then it would be necessary to obtain a streaming content set-top device (Roku, Apple TV or something like that) to grab the signal and translate it into something watchable on my TV.  One time expense, of course, but still an expense.

2)  ESPN.  And, no, I'm not talking about SportsCenter so much, as that "franchise" has pretty much played itself out in my mind, repeating the same news about the same few teams, schools and athletes (Yankees, Red Sox, Patriots, Cowboys, Lakers, Celtics, Duke, North Carolina, Florida, Tiger Woods) over and over and over......well, you get the idea, if you're not familiar.  But I would miss their live sports broadcasts, particularly since so many University of Kentucky football and basketball games are broadcast on various ESPN channels (the Southeastern Conference and ESPN signed a massive rights agreement a couple of years ago and now SEC sports, featuring Kentucky basketball, is a big element in ESPN's live sporting event schedule from September through March).  ESPN operates something called, but, as I understand it, it's not yet possible to stream that site's content to a set-top box such as I mentioned above.  Maybe at some point ESPN will change their mind on that, but, for now, can't see those games unless you have cable, or are willing to watch on a computer via ESPN3.

3)  Cable news.  I like to have all of the news I can get (although in the evenings it's hard to find news, as the cable news channels almost all have shows on that feature a good deal of commentary), so I'd really miss that.

4)  HGTV.  I know, it's surprising, but we watch many hours of their programming per week, and not just because my wife likes it.  I like many of their shows, too, largely due to familiarity, I suppose.

5)  Food Network/Travel Channel/TLC/TNT/TBS/Bravo/FX.  I could go on, but we watch a little bit of everything from these channels and more.

At least I'm not trying to convince anyone that I'm a big PBS viewer, as I'm not.

To be fair, we probably have channels we don't watch that we could delete from our cable menu, but every once in a while, there's something there that we would miss, so we keep those channels.  And keep paying for them.

I don't know if I will ever take the step our son and his family did, but it does make one think.  We did wean ourselves from subscribing to the local daily newspaper in our hometown, largely because my wife didn't have time to read it, and I'm comfortable reading it online.  But dropping cable, that's a much bigger adjustment.  Time will tell, I suppose.


Popular posts from this blog

Oscar Magico!

Good Monday morning to everyone!  If you're like me, and stayed up to watch the Oscars last night, you're a little sleep deprived.  I mean, after all, how often does an awards show end with a major twist in the ending?

If you didn't watch and have not watched or read the news, then you don't know about the colossal screw-up that ended what was a pretty entertaining Academy Awards show last night.  The final and biggest award, for the Best Picture, was being presented by Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway, selected apparently because 2017 represents the fiftieth anniversary year of their vehicle "Bonnie and Clyde."

In any case, after a brief political statement, the pair got down to business and introduced the nine nominees, then Beatty appeared a bit flummoxed by the contents of the envelope.  Dunaway laughed and said "you're impossible" and announced "La La Land," the odds-on favorite, as the winner.

In the midst of acceptance speeches b…

Learning opportunities

Good Monday morning to you.

Perhaps I should state up front that it's a bit of a blue Monday here in the Big Blue Nation, as our beloved Kentucky Wildcats went down in defeat to the arch-rival North Carolina Tar Heels last night in a wild and highly competitive game.  Kentucky's team never really got going in the first half, owing to foul trouble for three starters, and that foul trouble and lack of rhythm carried over for the rest of the game.  Somewhat miraculous that Kentucky had the lead at a couple of points late, but Carolina's depth and experience won out.

Though my wife doesn't agree, that's pretty much the end of basketball for me this year.  I don't watch much other college basketball except to see who Kentucky might end up playing, so if they're done, I probably am, too.

My company is getting into a new aspect of business that you've probably seen and heard about, but because I don't talk in detail about work in this space, I won't el…

Stunningly apathetic

Good afternoon to everyone.  Unusual day and time to post, but my schedule got a little fouled up this week.

Are you planning to watch the Super Bowl?  For a number of years, starting when our kids were, well, kids, we really made a big deal of the day of the big game, buying special snacks, planning a menu appropriate to the site of the game or the participating teams' cities, and so forth.

Last year was great, since the Denver Broncos won and our daughter and her family are season ticket holders!

But this year?  Hard to get excited about the New England Patriots (again) and the Atlanta Falcons.  Admittedly, the Falcons have a Kentucky native and UK grad on the roster, tight end Jacob Tamme, but he was injured mid-season and won't play.  But otherwise, the Falcons don't have any players who command a high level of attention from me.

And then there's the Patriots.  Sorry to my friends in the northeast, but I don't care for the team owner, the head coach, the offens…